| Evaluation Criteria | Description | Score (1-5) |
|---|---|---|
| Technical proficiency | Demonstrates knowledge and skill in coding languages and tools relevant to the role | |
| Problem-solving ability | Ability to analyze, understand, and solve complex coding challenges | |
| Time management | Ability to manage time effectively and prioritize tasks to meet project deadlines | |
| Code organization | Ability to structure code in a logical and organized manner | |
| Attention to detail | Ability to identify and correct errors and bugs in code | |
| Documentation | Ability to write clear and concise comments and documentation to explain the code | |
| Communication | Ability to explain their approach to the challenge and collaborate effectively with others | |
| Creativity | Ability to think outside the box and propose innovative solutions to problems | |
| Overall impression | Overall impression of the candidate's performance in the code challenge |
| Score | Interpretation |
|---|---|
| 4.5-5 | Very Suitable: The candidate demonstrates exceptional skills and knowledge in all of the evaluation criteria, and would be an excellent fit for the role. |
| 3.5-4.49 | Suitable: The candidate demonstrates solid skills and knowledge in most of the evaluation criteria, and would be a good fit for the role. |
| 2.5-3.49 | Neutral: The candidate demonstrates adequate skills and knowledge in some of the evaluation criteria, but may need further training or development in certain areas. |
| 1.5-2.49 | Unlikely Suitable: The candidate demonstrates insufficient skills or knowledge in some of the evaluation criteria, and may not be a good fit for the role without additional training or development. |
| 1-1.49 | Not Suitable: The candidate demonstrates significant weaknesses or deficiencies in most of the evaluation criteria, and is unlikely to be a good fit for the role. |
| Total Score | Interpretation |
|---|---|
| 22.5-25 | Very Suitable: The candidate demonstrates exceptional skills and knowledge in all of the evaluation criteria, and would be an excellent fit for the role. |
| 17.5-22.49 | Suitable: The candidate demonstrates solid skills and knowledge in most of the evaluation criteria, and would be a good fit for the role. |
| 12.5-17.49 | Neutral: The candidate demonstrates adequate skills and knowledge in some of the evaluation criteria, but may need further training or development in certain areas. |
| 7.5-12.49 | Unlikely Suitable: The candidate demonstrates insufficient skills or knowledge in some of the evaluation criteria, and may not be a good fit for the role without additional training or development. |
| 5-7.49 | Not Suitable: The candidate demonstrates significant weaknesses or deficiencies in most of the evaluation criteria, and is unlikely to be a good fit for the role. |